[3R]法术反制戒指的问题

[啊蛮]

这枚戒指有些象“储法戒指”，可以储一个一至六级法术，但不同的是不能用于施展。如果有人对佩带者施展同一法术，则戒指会自动对该法术进行反制，效果如同反制法术，但佩带者不须做任何动作（甚至不需要相关的知识） 。 一旦反制效果启动，则戒指内的法术就会消失，其后可存入一个新的法术。

我找到的描述如上

我的问题是，这个反制是对所有的法术？还是只反制针对佩戴者的法术
比如纠缠术这种没有目标的，是不是戒指就不能反制？

[Sigel]

這個問題存疑。

[OckhamTheRazor]

Instead, should that spell ever be cast upon the wearer, the spell is immediately countered, as a counterspell action, requiring no action (or even knowledge) on the wearer’s part.
我认为只有目标型法术才可以

[minovo]

这话题当初和朋友讨论了好久，结果是没目标的法术不能反。

[艾思哲]

某认为是范围波及施法者的就可以，不然像火球术这样的大路货不能反也令人觉得很奇怪= =

Counterspells: This ring might seem to be a ring of spell storing upon first examination. However, while it allows a single spell of 1st through 6th level to be cast into it, that spell cannot be cast out of the ring again. Instead, should that spell ever be cast upon the wearer, the spell is immediately countered, as a counterspell action, requiring no action (or even knowledge) on the wearer’s part. Once so used, the spell cast within the ring is gone. A new spell (or the same one as before) may be placed in it again.
Moderate evocation; CL 11th; Forge Ring, imbue with spell ability; Price 4,000 gp.

如果是只有目标型的可以，那么应该会特别指出targeted caster什么的。

[aland]

奇怪的事多了, 見怪不怪.
相反真要咬文嚼字Fireball這類範圍法術也不一定是cast upon the target的...

比較常用的判法貌似是單體可以.

[user8786]

存在疑问的物品最好的方法就是不让它出现=。=

理论上这个戒指的叙述应该是指有指向性的法术