作者 主题: 关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?  (阅读 5928 次)

副标题: 恩,不邪恶n_n

离线 逆神猪

  • 满地乱滚的猪
  • Flawless
  • *******
  • 帖子数: 5961
  • 苹果币: -2
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #20 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 10:05:35 »
引用
其实DRU变成动物,就会已动物的方式来思考
这个太扯谈了吧,保留自身的后三项属性难道是假的?

引用
规则中特别提到DRU只能变熟悉的动物
作为没有提到明确的游戏中限制的规则..这几乎不成问题,想变什么背景上交代一下就是了

引用
动物就可以骑,骑手的专长就可以适用
这一条好象找不到反驳的理由

引用
动作也没少什么
试想一下一匹空身最多跑40尺的狮子...骑个人上去就能跑80尺了..这是何道理?受之魂爆发?? :em005

引用
你的坐骑在受你控制时,是依照你的先攻权数值来作出行动

受你控制呢...所以说坐骑放弃控制权的话,用这个好象没错,坐骑要抢回控制权的话就不同了吧(骑手让PC坐骑从酸池里趟过去,PC坐骑还会受你控制?)
这个人已经懒得什么都不想留下了

离线 aland

  • Goddess
  • ********
  • 帖子数: 7758
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #21 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 11:36:08 »
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20050125a
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20050201a
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20050208a
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20050215a
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20050222a

Moving While Mounted

When you and your mount move, the two of you use your mount's speed rating, adjusted for the mount's encumbrance and the terrain. Because your mount takes you along with it when it moves, a move for your mount also counts as a move for you. (See Rules of the Game, All About Movement for notes on what constitutes movement.) Even though you're not propelling yourself, you still spend time moving. So, for example, if you and your mount move, neither you nor your mount can take a 5-foot step during the same turn.


Intelligent Mounts

According to the Dungeon Master's Guide, a mount with an Intelligence score of 3 or higher acts like an NPC ally rather than a mount. Riding such an ally works much like riding an aggressive mount in battle (see Part Two), except that you don't have to make a Ride check to act while riding. (If your mount carries you willingly, the ride is smooth enough so your actions aren't restricted.) You also cannot make a Ride check to control the mount's actions, but you can make a Diplomacy (or possibly a Wild Empathy) check to get the mount to accept your direction. If you do, your mount acts just like a mount trained for combat riding.
Even if you cannot (or do not choose to) direct your mount's actions, you still can ride along, making your own initiative roll and possibly delaying until after your mount acts, as noted in Part Two.

Aggressive Mounts in a Battle

A character could ride a mount that isn't cowardly in battle, but still isn't trained to carry a rider into combat. For example, a riding dog might be inclined to fight when danger threatens. If you're a druid or ranger, you might use your wild empathy ability (and maybe a speak with animalsspell or two) to induce some big carnivore to give you a lift. If you find yourself in a battle while still astride your mount/ally, you and your improvised mount still act on your initiative number. You must attempt a Ride check to direct the mount's actions, which is noted in the section on unruly mounts. If you fail, the mount might stick around to fight. If so, the mount moves where it will, but you still can't take any other action in the same round that you made the failed check (you spend your time just staying on).



 :em001
« 上次编辑: 2008-01-19, 周六 11:52:43 由 aland »
As Divine Grace ┓( ̄▽  ̄)┏

离线

  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • 帖子数: 6778
  • 苹果币: 7
  • 夜空中的闪烁
    • STAR的实验室
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #22 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 11:57:05 »
AD老爷果然好彪悍,好犀利

离线 aland

  • Goddess
  • ********
  • 帖子数: 7758
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #23 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 12:07:07 »
这些静静躺在那里等待众人翻阅的规则都不是我写的呀 :em006  
As Divine Grace ┓( ̄▽  ̄)┏

离线 逆神猪

  • 满地乱滚的猪
  • Flawless
  • *******
  • 帖子数: 5961
  • 苹果币: -2
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #24 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 12:12:30 »
于是膜拜了AD老爷 :em006

ROTG和FAQ阅读量好大@_@
AD老爷难道全读完了嘛
这个人已经懒得什么都不想留下了

离线 mimir

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3946
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #25 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 12:33:02 »
只要记住上面提了哪些问题,到时候晓得去翻就可以了
不可能全部背下来
Aa' i'sul nora lanne'lle
Aa' menle nauva calen ar' ta hwesta e' ale'quenle
Aa' menealle nauva calen ar' malta
Aa' lasser en lle coia orn n' omenta gurtha

Amin harmuva onalle e' cormamin
Amin khiluva lle a' gurtha ar' thar
Amin naa lle nai, a'maelamin
Cormamin niuve tenna' ta elea lle au'

离线 aland

  • Goddess
  • ********
  • 帖子数: 7758
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #26 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 12:45:17 »
引用
只要记住上面提了哪些问题,到时候晓得去翻就可以了
不可能全部背下来
/me 不过是多扫了几遍而已...

Mirmir老爷最厉害了 :em006  
As Divine Grace ┓( ̄▽  ̄)┏

离线 Stuart

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3866
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #27 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 13:02:12 »
哼唧,和我说的有啥不同?
人不是什么时候都能活得光明正大,本想抬头挺胸前进,却不知何时就会沾一身泥巴。

离线 逆神猪

  • 满地乱滚的猪
  • Flawless
  • *******
  • 帖子数: 5961
  • 苹果币: -2
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #28 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 13:15:25 »
Because your mount takes you along with it when it moves, a move for your mount also counts as a move for you.

便和你说的人宠双移不同呀
这个人已经懒得什么都不想留下了

离线 Stuart

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3866
  • 苹果币: 0
关于PC骑PC,大家觉得该怎么判?
« 回帖 #29 于: 2008-01-19, 周六 13:30:59 »
是你没仔细看骑乘战斗的规则吧,XD!我什么时候说人宠双移?我说的是动作没少什么,是针对你说的只有骑手有动作,被骑的没动作而言

乘骑中的战斗:。。。。省略
和战马共同战斗:如果你指引你经过战争训练的坐骑在战斗中攻击,你依然可以正常地做你自己的攻击。。。。。省略


我只是没考虑到智能坐骑的问题,不过用外交什么的其实可以忽略
骑都骑了还外什么交

 
人不是什么时候都能活得光明正大,本想抬头挺胸前进,却不知何时就会沾一身泥巴。