作者 主题: 4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题  (阅读 4335 次)

副标题:

离线 Sheepy

  • 純良的白色生物
  • 風紀委
  • *
  • 帖子数: 14113
  • 苹果币: 2
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #10 于: 2010-04-07, 周三 23:31:11 »
引用
威吓不算吧,不会受伤害貌似
留意你只被要求去攻擊目標. 有一些攻擊是不帶傷害的, 例如睡眠術. 這些帶攻擊骰的威能也算攻擊, 能滿足維持挑戰的條件. 因此你的動作會不會帶來傷害, 對能否維持挑戰沒有影響.
« 上次编辑: 2010-04-07, 周三 23:38:22 由 Sheepy »
(10:23:05 PM) 欧剃: 咩的笑话一般不仅冷,而且是黑漆漆的阴冷?
(10:23:11 PM) 布布: 这只是,对别人来说是掉SAN值的腹黑,对咩来说仅仅是笑话而已
(10:23:45 PM) ***Sheepy 聳肩, 一笑置之
(10:24:17 PM) ***布布 死了
  D&D 4e 歿土英豪 頭兩章試譯

离线 法术大师

  • Peasant
  • 帖子数: 8
  • 苹果币: 0
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #11 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 00:19:31 »
Divine Challenge Paladin Feature
You boldly confront a nearby enemy, searing it with divine light if
it ignores your challenge.
At-Will ✦ Divine, Radiant
Minor Action Close burst 5
Target: One creature in burst
Effect: You mark the target. The target remains marked until
you use this power against another target, or if you fail
to engage the target (see below). A creature can be subject
to only one mark at a time. A new mark supersedes a
mark that was already in place.
While a target is marked, it takes a –2 penalty to attack
rolls for any attack that doesn’t include you as a target.

Also, it takes radiant damage equal to 3 + your Charisma
modifier the first time it makes an attack that doesn’t include
you as a target before the start of your next turn
. The
damage increases to 6 + your Charisma modifier at 11th
level, and to 9 + your Charisma modifier at 21st level.
On your turn, you must engage the target you challenged
or challenge a different target. To engage the
target, you must either attack it or end your turn adjacent
to it. If none of these events occur by the end of your turn,
the marked condition ends and you can’t use divine challenge
on your next turn.
You can use divine challenge once per turn.
Special: Even though this ability is called a challenge, it
doesn’t rely on the intelligence or language ability of the
target. It’s a magical compulsion that affects the creature’s
behavior, regardless of the creature’s nature. You can’t place
a divine challenge on a creature that is already affected by
your or another character’s divine challenge.
« 上次编辑: 2010-04-08, 周四 00:21:10 由 法术大师 »

离线 某某

  • 言多必失,团多必坑!
  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3642
  • 苹果币: 0
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #12 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 00:25:08 »
抱歉,我英文不好。
别人笑我太坑,我笑他人不懂。

离线 水银

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 2837
  • 苹果币: 0
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #13 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 00:27:25 »
我记得范围攻击或者two targets之类的只要打pal就可以不吃伤害,单体多段攻击打别人一律都吃。

离线 Snow Patrol

  • 破邪显正
  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3473
  • 苹果币: 0
    • weibo
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #14 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:09:52 »
引用
不看是不是目標, 看是不是攻擊. 有攻擊骰的就是攻擊. 次目標要攻擊骰的話就算, 對次目標沒攻擊骰就不算.
有攻击骰的就是攻击
那么
如果主要目标攻击骰会决定是否进行次要目标的攻击骰,那是不是两个攻击骰有先后呢?
主要目标和次要目标两个攻击骰是不是就是两次攻击呢?
同样
如果是范围攻击n个目标的n个攻击骰也应该认为是n次攻击呢?
M: I don't know how to put this to you, but trainspotters do have a certain reputation.
T: Which reputation are you thinking of?
M: Well... maybe for being a little bit dull?
T: I think you become involved to an extent that you ignore the real world outside. You come into your own little world and you have many people who join you in that, whether they're interested in mechanics, interested in the actual observations, interested in the operations. They all have their own little interest. But it means that we're committed to what we enjoy.
M: A little obsessive, then? You will admit to a little obsessive, would you?
T: I think obsessive, possibly, yes. Certainly not dull.

离线 水银

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 2837
  • 苹果币: 0
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #15 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:14:26 »
范围攻击n个目标算一次攻击,否则某些东西会很好看

离线 Snow Patrol

  • 破邪显正
  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3473
  • 苹果币: 0
    • weibo
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #16 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:39:42 »
引用
范围攻击n个目标算一次攻击,否则某些东西会很好看
那主次目标的两个骰也应是同一次攻击咯?
M: I don't know how to put this to you, but trainspotters do have a certain reputation.
T: Which reputation are you thinking of?
M: Well... maybe for being a little bit dull?
T: I think you become involved to an extent that you ignore the real world outside. You come into your own little world and you have many people who join you in that, whether they're interested in mechanics, interested in the actual observations, interested in the operations. They all have their own little interest. But it means that we're committed to what we enjoy.
M: A little obsessive, then? You will admit to a little obsessive, would you?
T: I think obsessive, possibly, yes. Certainly not dull.

离线 水银

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 2837
  • 苹果币: 0
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #17 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:48:01 »
引用
引用
范围攻击n个目标算一次攻击,否则某些东西会很好看
那主次目标的两个骰也应是同一次攻击咯?
不可,否则很多以受到攻击为触发条件的即时动作怎么算,得等两次攻击都打完了才能触发?

离线 AlbertNi

  • Sleeper, Lord of Helpless, The Brainless
  • Goddess
  • ********
  • 帖子数: 7244
  • 苹果币: 2
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #18 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:51:48 »
我的简单判法:
字面描述每出现一次Attack:A vs B算一次攻击(特例:A vs B, two attacks这样的算2次攻击)
没有攻击骰但是造成威胁的power算一次攻击(比如某某墙)
« 上次编辑: 2010-04-08, 周四 02:53:44 由 AlbertNi »
突然之间不知道放神马签名好了……
哦对了,我也是新人了!

离线 Snow Patrol

  • 破邪显正
  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3473
  • 苹果币: 0
    • weibo
4E 关于圣武士挑战的问题
« 回帖 #19 于: 2010-04-08, 周四 03:02:05 »
那回到狗头的问题
既然是两次攻击,一个 主次目标 不同 的威能释放者,必然要受帕拉丁挑战的神圣伤害咯?
M: I don't know how to put this to you, but trainspotters do have a certain reputation.
T: Which reputation are you thinking of?
M: Well... maybe for being a little bit dull?
T: I think you become involved to an extent that you ignore the real world outside. You come into your own little world and you have many people who join you in that, whether they're interested in mechanics, interested in the actual observations, interested in the operations. They all have their own little interest. But it means that we're committed to what we enjoy.
M: A little obsessive, then? You will admit to a little obsessive, would you?
T: I think obsessive, possibly, yes. Certainly not dull.