我觉得, 如果MT的级别在算UrP的时候, 算成了3/2, 那按照UrP的cl计算规则, 就是说默认了MT的级别提升了UrP的class level,
错了，MT的级别只提升了UrP的caster level(注意cl绝大多数情况下是描述caster level而不是class level)
那么同样的道理, 对于MT的另一个施法职业, 也会提升其class level...这样就又是矛盾了...同样也会出现递归式...
只提升caster level以及相应的施法能力，而不是class level
我说的cl是caster level的意思, 我现在觉得, 即使这里是class level, 理解也是需要看DM的房规的,比如UrP的cl=A+B, A=class level, B=1/2(其他所有施法职业的class level)
srd里在定义caster level的时候说, A spell's power often depends on its caster level,
which for most spellcasting characters is equal to your class level in the class you're using to cast the spell.
而MT进阶一个基础职业的时候说, When a new mystic theurge level is gained, the character gains new spells per day
as if he had also gained a level in any one arcane spellcasting class he belonged to before he added the prestige class and any one divine spellcasting class he belonged to previously. He does not, however, gain any other benefit a character of that class would have gained (bonus metamagic or item creation feats, bard or assassin abilities, and so on). This essentially means that he adds the level of mystic theurge to the level of whatever other arcane spellcasting class and divine spellcasting class the character has, then determines spells per day and caster level accordingly.
也就是说, MT或者其他任何一种进阶的施法者职业, 在算人物的caster level的时候, 都会把MT的class level加上原来职业的class level, 这两者的和来决定caster level.
而根据caster level的定义, 这就说明了: 即使原先的class level并没有增加, 在计算caster level的时候, 也一律视为class level是增加....现在在计算像UrP这种caster level的时候,
等式的右面即使都是class level, 但是因为是在计算caster level, 根据这样的说法, 对于所有出现class level的地方都应该理解为原class level+进阶class level...这样的话, 比如用MT进UrP和Nar, 那么在Nar的class level计算部分, 就应该是Nar class level+MT class level, 而且MT自己也是施法职业, 于是还有一个1/2 MT class level也会出现在等式的右面...也就是说MT的class level被算了3次, UrP一次, Nar一次, 它自己再一次...
