純美蘋果園

TRPG討論區 => 研討區 => 3版 討論區 => 主题作者是: 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔 于 2012-03-20, 周二 12:26:56

主题: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔2012-03-20, 周二 12:26:56
神圣伙伴 Divine Companion [CC]
限制:术士
等级:一级
失去:魔宠
得到:隐形的多功伙伴,能储存能量以用做治疗与防卫。
详细请查阅原书。

求详细内容
主题: 好长!
作者: Falengel2012-03-20, 周二 12:44:36
Divine Companion
By sacrificing a possible link to an earthly creature, you gain the ability to store arcane energy in a divine reservoir that takes the form of a spirit creature. Linked to you through your own life essence, this divine companion can then transform that energy into benefi cial effects.

Level
: 1st.

Replaces: This benefi t replaces the summon familiar class feature.

Benefit: You can spend 100 gp to perform a ritual dedicated to the deity of your choice and summon forth a spirit creature to aid you in your adventures. This creature is both invisible and intangible, but it provides you with real benefits.

The divine companion stores arcane energy and redirects it to you according to your level and your needs. To fill this reservoir, you must cast one or more targeted spells at this creature. A spell so cast does not produce its normal effect; the companion simply absorbs the spell’s energy. It can store a number of spell levels equal to your arcane caster level. You can cast spells into it at any time, but after you rest and recover your spell slots for the day, the divine companion loses any stored energy.

The divine companion exists outside reality and cannot be affected by spells, spell-like abilities, or any sort of antimagic effect or dispel check. It cannot, however, release its arcane energy within an antimagic fi eld or similar effect. It uses your caster level for any checks required, and when it releases arcane energy, the level of the effect created equals the number of spell levels released.

The divine companion can release its stored spell energy in either of the following ways, at your command. You can use each effect as often as you wish, until the companion’s stored energy is depleted.

Healing (Su): As a standard action, you can order your divine companion to convert the energy it has stored into healing power. This is the equivalent of a conjuration (healing) spell. This effect heals you for 1d6 points of damage per stored spell level, or as many levels as you designate (up to the maximum currently stored).

Shielding (Su): As a swift action, you can order the creature to convert the energy it has stored into protecting you. This is the equivalent of an abjuration spell that provides you with a defl ection bonus to AC and a resistance bonus on saves each equal to the number of stored spell levels, or as many levels as you designate (up to the maximum currently stored). This effect lasts for 1 round per arcane caster level you possess.
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: Metatron2012-03-20, 周二 13:02:59
有了这个术士战力顿时就突破天际了啊
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔2012-03-20, 周二 18:45:51
谢谢了(虽然还是看不懂)
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: OckhamTheRazor2012-03-20, 周二 19:16:01
还要看让不让用物品充能...
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: Falengel2012-03-20, 周二 20:37:03
谢谢了(虽然还是看不懂)
简单的说,你是一个2N级术士,CL为2N,会用N级法术。
你可以把若干法术扔向守护灵,总计法术等级不超过2N。然后你就能:

1、用标准动作让守护灵给你回 xD6点HP,x不超过2N;
2、用迅捷动作让守护灵给你加 x点偏斜AC,x不超过2N,持续2N轮。

很显然,当术士等级高一点以后,能够胡堆AC乱加血……
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: rockroxas2012-03-20, 周二 21:08:27
关键是这个是看CL而不是术士等级……
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔2012-03-21, 周三 11:24:47
好像还有豁免检定?
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: rockroxas2012-03-22, 周四 09:45:16
一个是治疗,一个是BUFF,你说哪个有豁免?
不过看起来,好像只有目标型法术才能储到神圣伙伴上……?
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: 涅薇儿·德拉诺尔2012-03-22, 周四 09:50:48
a resistance bonus on saves 这个不是豁免加值?
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: rockroxas2012-03-22, 周四 12:06:21
哦,那个是加抗力加值到豁免上,不跟斗篷叠……
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: OckhamTheRazor2012-03-22, 周四 12:17:17
比斗篷高...
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: rockroxas2012-03-22, 周四 12:50:34
也许是我跑的战团少,但我总觉得团外要求过豁免的比率也占一半……?
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: 逆神猪2012-03-25, 周日 00:45:02
据说储法道具可以给这个充能,因为视为你放的,触发道具不能,因为是物品放的
主题: Re: 3R CC书 关于这个替换能力的详细内容
作者: OckhamTheRazor2012-03-25, 周日 02:09:40
这问题争论也不是两三年了...没有哪里有明确的写法。
从万律的说法和合理性来讲我觉得应该判不能。
不过总归是个见仁见智的问题。